SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(All) 15

DEOKI NANDAN
KRISHNA PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
AKAL CHAND – Respondent


DEOKI NANDAN, J.

This is a defendants second appeal in a suit for partition. The appellants are respectively Krishna Pal Singh, defendant no. 3; Smt. Savitri Devi, Km Sushma, Km. Babli and Papoo, legal representatives of deceased Mahendra Pal Singh, defendant no. 4; and Jogendra Pal Singh, defendants no. 6.

A cross objection filed by Ram Niwaz, defendant no. 1, on 15th March, 1974 was rejected by this Courts order dated 9th July, 1974 on account of insufficiency of Court fees.

The land in suit appears to have been taken on lease on 19th February, 1951 jointly by the plaintiffs and the defendants from the then Zamindar before the abolition of Zamindari, but it appears that after the abolition of Zamindari, ihe parties obtained a Bhumidhari Sanad and became bhumidhars of the land. The plaintiffs claimed l/5th share in the land in suit. There are constructions-on the land which are in two parts; one towards north and the other towards-south. The land in between the two sets of constructions is vacant.

The first defendant admitted the plaintiffs claim but pleaded that he had never refused to partition the property out of Court, and prayed that his l/5th share may also be separated.

The

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top