In the basic year Khatauni the respondent Smt. Nirmala Devi was recorded as Sirdar of plot Vo. 271 measuring 1 Bigha, 19 Biswas and 18 Biswansis. The petitioner filed an objection contending that her husband Ram Asrey and after his death she herself had been in possession for more than 30 years and had as a consequence thereof acquired rights under the U. P. Tenancy Act and also under the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. This objection has been rejected by all the three Consolidation Authorities who have concurrently held the entry in favor of the respondent to be correct. Aggrieved thereby the petitioner has filed this writ petition. The following facts are not in dispute. Smt. Nirmala Devi the respondent had filed a suit against the petitioner which was decreed by the revenue Court. The final order passed by the Board of Revenue is annexure 20 to the writ petition. It is dated 25- 3-1964. Actually there were two suits, one about plot No. 271, which is in controversy in the instant case and the other about plot. No. 272, filed by the respondent against different persons. In para 13 of the judgment of the Board of Revenue which was common to the two a