SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(All) 193

M.WAHAJUDDIN
Qasim – Appellant
Versus
State of Allahabad – Respondent


M. WAHAJUDDIN, J.

( 1 ) THE applicants have been summoned under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324 and 307 I. P. C. as per order dt. 19. 2. 1983, Annexure 4. It would appear that the police submitted a final report in this case. A protest petition was preferred and the Magistrate then passed the following order:

Perused case diaries, application and other papers. In the cross case the accused have been challaned. Prima facie offences Under Section 147/148/324/323/307 IPC are made out against accused Qasim @ Fausi, Sukha Asghar, Mohd. Amin, Kamil, Hayat, Liyaqat, Mishtaq. Aalim, Amir, Ahmad, Hanif, Shuukat, Popat Jamil, Shakil Ahmad and Zafar and there are sufficient grounds to proceed against them. Issue warrants of arrest against them. Fix 24. 3. 1983. sd/ MQ. Siddiqi J. M. I. 19. 2. 1983.

( 2 ) IT is urged that the order is illegal and without jurisdiction and is a of 4 non-speaking order and was based mechanically and the Magistrate was bound lo follow the procedure for a complaint case which the Magistrate has failed to do and there was no provision for issuing warrant and the Magistrate could only direct a further investigation and police was right in submitting a final report. It was






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top