SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 1454

R.K.AGRAWAL, K.N.OJHA
Kalpana Palace – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAKESH KUMAR, SHAMBHU CHOPRA,

R. K. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) IN IT Ref. No. 46 of 1995 the Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following question of law under Section 256 (1) of the IT Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the Act, for opinion to this court :

"whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the grant-in-aid of Rs. 3,06,711 received by the assessee under the scheme of State of U. P. introduced with the object to promote the construction of permanent cinema buildings in the backward areas as revenue receipt in the hands of the assessee ?"

( 2 ) IN the IT Appeal No. 5 of 2001, the appellant had raised five questions of law which, according to it, are substantial questions of law. However, the decision on the question referred by the Tribunal under Section 256 (1) of the Act would also decide the aforementioned IT appeal. The reference and the appeal, as they raise a common question of law, have been heard together and are being decided by a common judgment.

( 3 ) FOR the sake of brevity, the facts of the IT Ref. No. 46 of 1995 are given below : the applicant is a registered partnership firm and is engaged in the business of cinema exhibition. During

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top