HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Arun Tandon
COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT LOK MANYA TILAK INTER COLLEGE ISKIL JHANSI
Versus
STATE OF U P
Decided On : 25 August 2004
C. M. W. P. No. 34210 of 2004
Committee of Management - Extension of Term - Section 16-A (5) of the Intermediate Education Act - The court discussed the amendment in Clause 8 of the scheme of administration, which extended the term of the Committee of Management from three years to five years. The court emphasized the mandatory nature of Section 16-A (5) and held that the amended term would become applicable only from the date it was approved by the Joint Director of Education. The court concluded that the Committee of Management's term had expired, and upheld the appointment of a Prabandh Sanchalak to hold fresh elections.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petition was filed against the order appointing a Prabandh Sanchalak in an institution for holding fresh elections of the Committee of Management as the term of the earlier Committee of Management had expired.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the appointment of a Prabandh Sanchalak and directing for fresh elections of the Committee of Management.
Issues: The main issue was the validity of the order appointing a Prabandh Sanchalak and the extension of the term of the Committee of Management.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the mandatory nature of Section 16-A (5) and held that the amended term would become applicable only from the date it was approved by the Joint Director of Education.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and no costs were imposed.
Heard Sri M. D. Singh shekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri I. M. Kushwaha, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5 and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
2. Committee of Management of Lok Manya Tilak Inter College, Iskil, Jhansi through its Manager, Sri Prahlad Singh Verma has filed this writ petition against the order passed by the Regional Joint Director of Education, Jhansi Mandal, Jhansi dated 30th July, 2004 whereby under Clause 8 of the approved scheme of administration he has appointed a Prabandh Sanchalak in the institution for holding fresh elections of the Committee of Management as the term of the earlier Committee of Management has since expired.
3. On behalf of the petitioner it is contended that the said order passed by the Regional Joint Director of Education is patently illegal inasmuch the last elections of the Committee of Management had taken place on 23rd July, 2000, the term prescribed under the amended scheme of administration was three years with a grace period of one month, therefore, it would expire on 23rd August, 2003. Prior to the expiry of the term of the Committee of Management, on a resolution passed by the Committee of Management, the Joint Director of Education vide order dated 28th July, 2003 had approved the amendment in the Clause-8 of the scheme of administration providing for extension of the term of the Committee of Management from three years to five years.
4. It is, therefore, contended that the term of the Committee of Management extended on 28th July, 2004 would continue till 22nd July, 2001 with a grace period of one month under Clause 8 of the amended scheme of administration. In support of the said contention the petitioner has placed reliance upon the clause 8 of the scheme of administration and the order passed by the Joint Director of Education dated 28th July, 2003, which has been enclosed as Annexure No. 2-B to the writ petition.
5. It is contended on behalf of the respondents that the order passed by the Joint direction of Education is strictly in accordance with law and the amendment in Clause-8 providing for extension of the term from three years to five years with a grace period of one month as approved by the Joint Director of Education vide order dated 28th July, 2003 would apply to the Committee of Management, which is elected subsequent to the said amendment being approved by the Joint Director of Education, it cannot be read in any manner to extend the term of Committee of Management, which was elected earlier for a term of three years, the term whereof has already expired.
6. On behalf of the respondent No. 5 various contentions have been raised for the purposes of alleging that the Committee of Management has harassed the respondent No. 5, who is working as Principal of the institution.
7. For appreciation the controversy raised in the present writ petition and as contended by the petitioner, it is necessary to refer to the Clause 8 of the scheme of administration as it stood to prior to the amendment. Amended Clause 8 of the scheme of administration is quoted herein below:
"prabandh Samiti ka karyakal-
Padadhikari avam Samiti ke sadasyon ka karyakal teen varsh hoga. Kayrya avadhi samapt ho janey par agley ek mash tak hi oadadhikari baney rah sakenqev. Yadi teen varsh ke bad ak mah ke andar nav chaynit Samiti karyabhar grahan nahin karti to teen varsh ek mah bad kalateet Samiti ka karyakal swatah samapt samjha jayega aur sambhagiya up-shiksha nideshak drawar manonit ek vyakti prabandh sanchalak karyarat mana jayega. Jisey prabandhadhikaran key purn adhikar hongey. Vah Prabandh
Sanchalak nav chaynit Samiti ko shighratishighra karyarat kareyaga aur yadi chunav nahi hua to chunao karekey chaynit Samiti ko karyarat karegeyaga aur yadi Prabandh Samitiyon meyn adhikar ka daba hai to jiskey paksh main sambhgiya up Shiksha nidesha ka nirnay ho oosey karyarat kareyaga. "
8. It is not in dispute that the elections of the Committ
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.