SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 1483

UMESHWAR PANDEY, MARKANDEY KATJU
Brijpal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Srivastava, I.P.Singh, S.K.Srivastava,

M. KATJU, UMESHWAR PANDEY, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri A. K. Srivastava learneed Counsel for the appellant and Sri I. P. Singh and learned standing Counsel for the respondents.

( 2 ) THIS special appeal has been filed against the interim order of the learned Single Judge dated 22. 7. 2004 staying the transfer order of the writ petitioner and directing that he shall continue to work as Junior Engineer, Vikas Khand Sikandarabad, District Bulandshahar and be paid his salary.

( 3 ) IN Special Appeal No. 555 of 2004, State of U. P. v. Smt. Meera Sankhwar, decided on 12. 7. 2004, this Court has in great detail discussed which interim orders are appeallable and which are not. The entire case law has been discussed in that decision and hence we are not referring to the same.

( 4 ) SUBSEQUENTLY in Special Appeal No. 860 of 2004, Shesh Nath Singh v. Mukesh Singh and ors. , decided on 26. 7. 2004 and in Special Appeal No. 855 of 2004, Union of India v. Raghubir prasad, decided on 21. 7. 2004 and Special Appeal No. 911 of 2004, decided on 5. 8. 2004, sandeep Kumar Singh v. State of U. P. , we have held that a special appeal lies against an interim order of a learned Single Judge staying the transfer ord




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top