SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 649

MUKTESHWAR PRASAD
Parmal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.P.DIXIT, R.K.TRIPATHI,

MUKTESHWAR PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the accused is directed against the judgment and order dated 7th Decem-ber, 1981 passed by Sri Y. R. Tripathi, the then Additional Sessions Judge, Ghazipur whereby he convicted accused Parmal under Section 308 read with Section 34 IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two and half years. He further convicted the accused under Section 24 of the Cattle Trespass Act and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two months. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

( 2 ) IN brief, the facts of the prosecution case as revealed from the record are as under: A civil suit No. 94/75 was filed by Naik, father of the appellant, against Mangru Singh, the informant for permanent injunction and the plaintiff obtained ex parte temporary injunction and the parties were restrained from making construction over the disputed land. The defendant was further restrained from objecting the plaintiff from taking water from the well in suit. The suit was filed on 22-5-1975.

( 3 ) ON 1-6-1975 at about 6-00 p. m. cattle (cow) owned by the accused were grazing and damaging the surgarcane crop standing i




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top