SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 762

MARKANDEY KATJU, R.S.TRIPATHI
SHANTI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
BABU RAM YADAV – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M.SRIVASTAV, P.P.SRIVASTAVA, R.N.Singh, V.K.Chandel, V.K.S.Chandel,

By the Court. Heard Sri M. M. Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri P. P. Srivastava, for the respondent.

2. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the family Court, Azamgarh dated 5-10- 2001. By that judgment it has been directed that the appellant No. 1 Smt. Shanti Devi should hand over custody of her daughter Km. Kusum to respondent Babu Ram Yadav, who is the husband of Smt. Shanti Devi.

3. A perusal of the impugned judgment shows that Km. Kusum was about 17 years age in 2001. Hence now she is about 20 years of age. There is no dispute about the factum of the age of Km. Kusum.

4. Under the Indian Majority Act, 1875 a person who completes 18 years of age is known as a major. Once a person becomes a major then in the eye of law he or she can decide his/her own welfare since he/she has attained the age of discretion. Hence there can be no valid order or direction for custody of a major. Custody can be awarded only in respect of a minor. So far as a major is concerned he or she is free to live with anybody or go anywhere. Even the parents cannot control a major boy or girl.

5. At the time when the impugned judgment was passed Km. Kusum may have





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top