HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
N.K.Mehrotra, J.
KULDEEP SINGH
Versus
STATE OF U P
Decided On : 01 June 2004
Criminal Revision No. 247 of 2004
Juvenile Justice Act - Juvenile Status Determination - The court declared the revisionist as juvenile based on the school leaving certificate and the provisions of Rule 22(5) of the Rules made under the Juvenile Justice Act.
Fact of the Case:
The revisionist challenged the order rejecting his plea to be declared juvenile under the Juvenile Justice Act, based on a school leaving certificate showing his date of birth.
Finding of the Court:
The court set aside the impugned order and declared the revisionist as juvenile for the purpose of his trial in the criminal case.
Issues: The issue was the determination of the revisionist's juvenile status based on the school leaving certificate and the provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Rule 22(5) of the Rules made under the Juvenile Justice Act, which provides for determining the age of a child or juvenile based on the birth certificate issued by local bodies or the date of birth shown in the certificate from the school first attended or matriculation or equivalent certificates if available.
Final Decision: The revision was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, declaring the revisionist as juvenile for the purpose of his trial in the criminal case.
Heard the learned counsel for the revisionist and Shri Umesh Verma for the opposite party, the State of U. P.
2. Kuldeep Singh, the revisionist has challenged the legality of the order dated 21-5-2004 passed by the Special Judge (Gangsters Act), Faizabad on the application of the revisionist to declare him juvenile under Juvenile Justice Act.
3. The learned trial Court after taking into consideration, a document on the record has rejected the prayer of the revisionist and has refused to declare him as juvenile.
4. A perusal of the impugned order goes to show that there was a school leaving certificate of the applicant before the learned Sessions Judge showing the date of birth and according to that date of birth, he was juvenile on the date of the commission of the crime. The learned Sessions Judge has not decided the question of the applicant being juvenile in accordance with the provisions of Rule 22 (5) of the Rules made under Juvenile Justice Act in which it is provided that the age of the a child or juvenile shall be determined on the basis of the birth certificate issued by the local bodies or the date of birth shown in the certificate from the school first attended or matriculation or equivalent certificates if available.
5. In this case, the applicant has filed the copy of the school leaving certificate so the age of the applicant is to be determined as per date of birth given in the school leaving certificate after ignoring any other evidence. The learned Sessions Judge had refused to consider this school leaving certificate on
the ground which are not substantiated by law. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and revisionist Kuldeep Singh is declared juvenile for the purpose of his trial in case crime No. 717 of 2003, under Sections 147/148/149/ 307/504/506/302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (1) of U. P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act of Police Station Gosainganj, District Sultanpur.
6. In view of the above the revision is allowed and impugned order so far as it relates to revisionist Kuldeep Singh, is set aside.
.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.