SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 1263

KRISHNA MURARI
Heera Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ikram Ahmad,

KRISHNA MURARI, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri ikrani Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A. G. A.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case as stated in the writ petition are that the petitioner was married to respondent No. 2 in 1978 and gauna took place in 1982. He is an employee of Border Security Force and after his gauna, he went to Punjab in 1983 to join his duties. He came back to village in 1984 and found that his wife was in advance stage of pregnancy and a male child was born on 8-6-1984. The petitioner filed a matrimonial case for dissolution of marriage. First Appeal No. 619 of 1989 (Heera Singh v. Lalmuni devi) arising out of the said matrimonial case is pending before this Court. Respondent no. 2 moved an application under Section 125, Cr. P. C. claiming maintenance for her and respondent No. 3 who is minor son. In the said proceedings the petitioner moved an application praying that D. N. A. test of the minor child be conducted to establish that he was not born out of the wedlock and was illegitimate. This application was resisted by respondent No. 2 and was dismissed on 7-2-2004. Revision filed against the order was also dismissed by Sessions judge, Ghazipur.

( 3 ) IT















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top