SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 488

K.N.OJHA
Navita Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kamal Singh Yadav, ONKAR SINGH,

K. N. OJHA, J.

( 1 ) INSTANT revision has been preferred against order dated 23. 12. 1997 passed by the 1st additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffar Nagar, in Criminal Revision No. 150 of 1997, Brij Bahadur sharma v. Navita Sarma, by which the order passed by 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, muzaffar Nagar, in Case No. 7/11 of 1997 in favour of Navita Sharma under Section 125 Cr. P. C was set aside on the ground that the Court of Muzaffar Nagar has no territorial jurisdiction to decide the case because Navita Sharma was living with her father-in-law, Shiv Sharma, in district Ghaziabad. The Court below held that it is the Court of Ghaziabad, which will decide the case of maintenance of Navita Sharma against her husband.

( 2 ) AFTER the revision was filed by Navita Sharma notice was served on Brij Bahadur Sharma, opposite party No. 2, but none appeared for him at the time of argument, hence the arguments of the learned Counsel for the revisionist and the learned A. G. A. were heard and judgment is being delivered on merit.

( 3 ) THE fact of the case is the Smt. Navita Sharma filed Criminal Case No. 7/ 11 of 1997, Navita sharma v. Brij Bahadur Sharma, for maintenance at the rate o















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top