HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
VISHNU SAHAI, G.K.GUPTA
Asha Ram
Versus
State of U.P
CRIMINAL APPEAL 54 of 2002
Decided On : 19 March 2004
Criminal Appeal 54 Of 2002
JUDGMENT : Criminal Appeal - Indian Penal Code - Ss. 147, 148, 302/149, 201 - The judgment discusses the prosecution case, evidence, and the conviction and sentence of the appellants. The court analyzes the evidence of witnesses, the recovery of weapons, and the delay in lodging the FIR. The court finds the evidence of the witnesses to be unreliable and the recovery evidence to be inconclusive. The court allows the appeal, sets aside the conviction and sentence, and acquits the appellants.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the trial of six individuals for offenses under the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the appellants, along with others, were involved in the murder of three individuals. The prosecution presented witness testimony and recovery of weapons as evidence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the evidence of the witnesses to be unreliable and the recovery evidence inconclusive. The court concluded that the prosecution case must be true for a conviction, which was not established.
Issues: The issues revolved around the reliability of witness testimony and the recovery evidence, as well as the delay in lodging the FIR.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for credible and unimpeachable evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. It also highlighted the importance of corroborative evidence and the principle 'falsus uno, falsus omnibus' in assessing witness credibility.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence, and acquitted the appellants.
( 1 ) SIX persons, namely. Asha Ram, Magan, Chandrika, Ram chhattar, Shiv alias Shiv Prasad and Ghan shyam were tried by the IInd Additional sessions Judge, Bahraich in Sessions Trial no. 70 of 1997 for offences punishable under Ss. 147, 148, 302/149 and 201 of the indian Penal Code. Vide judgment and or dated 15-12-2001, the learned Judge acquitted Magan. Ram Chhattar, Shiv alias shiv Prasad and Ghan Shyam on all the counts but convicted and sentenced Asha ram and Chandrika In the manner stated hereinafter: (i) Under S. 147, I. P. C. to undergo six months R. I. (ii) Under S. 148, I. P. C. to underttd ne years R. I. ; and (iii) Under Ss. 302/149. 1. P. fc. to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of rs. 200/- each. In default to undergo 10 days simple imprisonment. The learned Judge directed the sentences of Asha Ram and Chandrika on all the counts to run concurrently.
( 2 ) AGGRIEVED by their convictions and sentences Asha Ram and Chandrika pre-ferred in this Court Criminal Appeal No. 54 of 2002 and Chandrika Criminal Appeal No. 187 of 2002. As a matter of fact Cri. Appeal no. 187 of 2002 should not have been, en-tertained by this Court because Chandrika, the sole appellant in it was also the appel-lant in Cri, Appeal No. 54 of 2002, It was entertained because the concerned clerk of the criminal section failed to make an en-dorsement on it that Chandrikas appeal (Cri. Appeal No. 54 of 2002) had already been passed.
( 3 ) SINCE both these appeals arise out of a common factual matrix and impugned judgment, we are disposing them of by a common Judgment.
( 4 ) SHORTLY stated the prosecution case runs as under:. . The informant Jamidar (P. W. 1) is the son of the deceased Hira Lal and the real brother of deceased-Talukdar and Faujdar. At the time of the incident the informant, the three deceased persons. Ramanand (P. W. 2 ). Urmila (P. W. 3) and appellants-Asha. Ram and Chandrika -were living in village gadattytm Purwa, hamlet of Rakhauna within the limits of Police Station Khairighat in district Bahraich. Appellants-Asha Ram and Chandrika, and the acquitted accused-Magan, Ram chhattar alias Lallu. Shiv alias Shiv Prasad and Ghan Shyam are interconnected and inter-related. Appellant-Chandrika and ac-quitted accused-Magan are the nephews of appellant-Asha Ram and Ram Chhattar is brother in law (wifes brother) of appellant-Ash a Ram. Shiva alias Shiv Prasad and ghan Shyam are the associates of the remaining appellants. Prior to the Incident enmity was subsisting between appellant Asha Ram on one hand and the three deceased persona on the other. At the time of the incident a dispute arising out of a grove was subsisting between appellant-Asha Ram and deceased-Hira Lal. Deceased-Faujdar had illicit relations with the wife of one Pahalwan of village Barhi. On account of it appellant-Asha Ram and others had ex-communicated the informant and others. On 18-9-1996 at about 8 p. m. appellants-Asha Ram and Chandrika along with acquitted accused-Magan, Rain Chhattar and Ghan Shyam came to the House of faujdar and Talukdar (deceased) who lived in separate houses in the immediate proximity of the informants house and took them to consume liquor. All of them conaumed liquor at the house of appellant -Aaha Ram. On the said date at about 8-9- p,m. Faujdar came to his house, accompanied by appellants-Asha Ram and Chandrika and acquitted accused-Chan Shyam. Magan, and Ram chhattar and in the presence of hia neighbour Ramanahd asked his daughter Urmila (P. W. 3) to give him mustard oil in a bottle which was required for cooking fish at the house of Ram Chhattar. Faujdar told Urmlla that she should eat and sleep and he would be eating at Ram Chhattars place. Thereafter Faujdar and others went away. At about 11 p. m. Talukdar came back to his house. On the night of 18/19-9-1996 the informant Jamidar slept at his door along with his brother-in-law Deba (P. W. 5) Chandrika (P. W. 4) another brother-in-law of the informant slept
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.