R.B.MISRA
Pradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD Sri Prakash Padia, with Sri Anant Misra, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned standing Counsel for the respondents. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties this writ petition is decided at this stage in view of Second proviso to Rule 2 of Chapter XXII of allahabad High Court Rules, 1952.
( 2 ) IN this petition prayer has been made for issuance of writ of mandamus to declare the result to the post of "bandi Rakshak" and issuance for writ of certiorari in quashing the order dated 1. 12. 2001 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) passed by the Principal Secretary, State Government and consequential order dated 22. 7. 2002 (Annexure-8 to the writ petition) passed by the secretary, State of Uttar Pradesh.
( 3 ) THE brief facts necessary for adjudication of the writ petition are that the advertisement was published for recruitment to the post of 218 "bandi Rakshak" under the Director General, karagar Evam Prashasan Sudhar Sevayen, U. P. , Lucknow in different range including Varanasi, bareilly, Fatehgarh, Naini, Lucknow, Mccrut, Agra, Saharanpur, Moradabd, Azamgarh. The petitioners applied in moradabad Range and had participate in the physical
Vinodan T. and Ors. v. University of Calicut and Ors.
S.Renuka and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Anr.
Shanker Sen Das v. Union of India and Ors.
Asha Kaul v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Union of India and Ors. v. S.S.Uppai
Hanuman Prasad v. Union of India and Ors.
Vice Chancellor, University of Allahabad v. Dr. Anand Prakash Mishra and Ors.
State of Bihar v. Secretariat, Assistant SE Union, 1986 and Ors.
Surinder Singh v. State of Punjab
State of Bihar and Ors. v. Mohd. Kalimuddin
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Harish Chandra
State of U.P.and Ors. v. Ram Swarup Saroj
Purshottam v. Chairman, Maharashtra State Electricity Board and Anr.
Sushma Suri v. Government of National Capital of Delhi
State of U.P. and Ors. v. Ram Chandra Trivedi
N.Meera Rani v. Govt. of Tamil Nadu and Anr.
N.S.Giri v. Corporation of City of Mangalore and Ors.
Coir Board, Ernakulam and Anr. v. Indira Devai P.S. and Ors.
Sub-Inspector Roop Lal and Anr. v. Lt. Governor, Delhi and Ors.
Lily Thomas and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
S.H.Rangappa v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
Union of India and Anr. v. Kirloskar Pneumatic Co. Ltd.
State of U.P. and Ors. v. Harish Chandra and Ors.
State of Punjab and Ors. v. Renuka Singla and Ors.
Satyendra Dwivedi v. Administrator, Nagar Mahapalika, Allahabad
1994 (6) SCC 651, Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.