Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2. The petitioners-plaintiffs aggrieved by an order passed by the trial Court, whereby the trial Court has rejected the application for grant of temporary injunction saying that the trial Court has already issued notices and without affording opportunity to the other side, no temporary injunction can be granted to the petitioners approached the revisional Court by means of revision and the revisional Court has also dismissed the revision preferred by the petitioners on the ground no irreparable injury has been caused to the petitioners by the order impugned in the revision, nor it has occasion in failure of justice. It is these two orders, which have been challenged by the petitioner by means of present writ petition.

3. So far as the order passed by the revisional Court is concerned, I do not find any error in the order passed by the revisional Court, so far as it says that revision is liable to be dismissed on the ground that no irreparable injury has been caused to the petitioners by the order impugned in the revision.

4. It is settled by series of decisions of this Court that the order issuing notices fo