SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 2021

RAKESH SHARMA
ATUL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
U P EXPORT CORPORATION LTD – Respondent


RAKESH SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Ritu Raj Awasthi learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri D. K. Upadhyaya learned Counsel for the opposite parties No. 1 and 2.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has assailed the order of dismissal passed against the petitioner on 12. 12. 1989 by the Administrative Officer of U. P. Export Corporation Limited, Lucknow.

( 3 ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner submits that at the relevant time, the petitioner was working as Centre Incharge; Carpet Weaving Training Scheme under the Regional Officer of u. P. Export Corporation at Agra. The petitioner was assigned to impart training to the trainees in carpet weaving on 2. 5. 1988. He was attached to the Regional Office of the above said corporation at Agra. The petitioner was relieved on 24. 11. 1988 from the Regional Office and was directed to go to his new place of posting. According to the petitioner, he was not informed about the place of posting where he was required to join. However, the petitioner was later on provided a copy of his posting order issued on 19. 8. 1988, directing the petitioner to join at achchncra Kerawali, Agra. Petitioner went to join at Achchnera but there was no Carpet weaving Centre whe














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top