SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 2103

DEVI PRASAD SINGH
DEEN DAYAL SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMIT BOSE, SHATRUGHAN CHAUDHARY,

DEVI PRASAD SINGH, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Shri Amit Bose learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Shatrughan choudhary learned Standing Counsel. Question of law involved in the present writ petition is as to whether under Regulation 497 of the U. P. Police Regulations a suspended employee shall be entitled to continue only at his place of posting by residing in police line of the district concerned and cannot be transferred to other place ? And under what circumstances this Court can interfere with the quantum of punishment awarded by the disciplinary authority ? Whether the services of an employee can be dismissed on account of unauthorised absence and non-compliance of a transfer order ?

( 2 ) PETITIONER was a Police Constable. In the year 1988 he was posted in the 32nd Battalion of pac at Lucknow. Against the petitioner a First Information Report was lodged on 30. 12. 1988 on the ground that petitioner had refused to perform patrol duty while posted at Katra Bijan Beg, police Station Chowk Lucknow. One another allegation against the petitioner was that when platoon commander had made certain enquiry from the petitioner, instead of submitting a reply in a dignified manner he all

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top