RAKESH TIWARI
Brij Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD Counsel for the parties and perused the record.
( 2 ) THIS writ petition has been filed by the petitioners against the award dated 22. 10. 1991 in adjudication Case No. 32/90 passed by the Labour Court (II), U. P. , Meerut.
( 3 ) PETITIONER No. 1 was employed as Seasonal Weighment Clerk in Mawana Sugar Works, mawana, District Meerut during the seasons 1982-83 to 1985-86. According to the petitioner-workman he was not employed in the season of 1986-87, which started w. e. f. 24. 10. 1986. He raised an industrial dispute which was referred to the aforesaid Labour Court.
( 4 ) THE case of the employers before the Labour Court was that the petitioner-workman was employed in the season of 1985-86 from 1. 1. 1986 to 13. 3. 1986. The season of 1985-86 lasted on 4. 4. 1986. Thus, the workman did not work for full season or in the later half of the aforesaid season of 1985-86, He also did not report for duty in the next season of 1986-87. It was further the case of the employers that the workman did not get his licence forwarded for renewal through the employers.
( 5 ) THE Labour Court framed seven additional issues and held on the basis of oral evidence that it
REFERRED TO : Panniji Sugar and General Mills v. Its Workmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.