SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 2160

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Pradeep Kant, Rajiv Sharma
YAGYA DUTT
Versus
STATE OF U P
Decided On : 25 November 2004
Special Appeal No. 429 of 2004

Advocates Appeared:
K.S.Bajpai, RAKESH SRIVASTAVA, Ranjana Agnihotri, Ritu Raj Awasthi,

The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a balanced and reasonable approach to fee determination, considering guidelines from relevant cases and government directives.

Headnote:

FEE DETERMINATION - HIGHER EDUCATION - T. M. A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka, 2002 (2) LBESR 933 (SC) : (2002) 8 S. C. C. 481 - G. O. dated 2-7-03 - Islamic Academy of Education and another v. State of Karnataka and others, 2004 (1) LBESR 85 (SC) : (2003)6 S. C. C 697 - Modern School v. Union of India, (2004) 2 UPLBEC 2012

Fact of the Case:

The special appeal arose from a dispute over the demand of additional fee for pursuing MBA/MCA courses. The court considered various interim orders and government directives related to fee determination and charged fees for different categories of seats.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the respondent institution's demand for additional fees was arbitrary and without authority. It determined an average fee of Rs. 48,125 for students of the 2003-04 batch, inclusive of tuition fee, development fee, and other fee. The court also directed students to pay any difference in fee and provided for adjustments based on the final determination by the Committee.

Issues: The main issue was the determination of additional fees for MBA/MCA courses, considering varying interim orders and government directives. The court also addressed the challenge to the imposition and quantum of development fee and other fee.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the T. M. A. Pai Foundation and Islamic Academy of Education cases to establish guidelines for fee determination. It emphasized the need for a reasonable surplus for expansion of the education system and development of education. The court also considered the principles of fee determination and the need for a balanced approach to address the transitional period.

Final Decision: The special appeal was allowed, and the court fixed an average fee of Rs. 48,125 for the 2003-04 batch of MBA/MCA students, subject to adjustments based on the final determination by the Committee. The court directed students to give an undertaking and notarized affidavit of the fee arrangement within a specified time.

On 25-9-04, we had allowed the special appeal and passed the following order:

"for the reasons to be recorded later, we allow the special appeal and fix an amount of Rs. 48,125/-as average, fee for students of 2003-04 batch of MBA/mca course for their first and second year course, which fee is inclusive of the average Tuition Fee, Development Fee and Other Fee. The aforesaid fee does not take into account the internal examination fee, University examination fee and insurance charges and the security and admission fee, if it has not already been paid, which amount is to be paid by the students in addition to the aforesaid amount. The students who have paid any amount towards the fee for the academic session 2003-04 (first year of the course), they shall only be required to pay the difference of amount, if any, becomes due, as per the amount which we have fixed for each of the academic years 2003-04 and 2004-05. The students, who are now pursuing the second year course and have not paid any fee, shall pay the entire amount of Rs. 48, 125.

We further direct that the students, who have not paid any fee in their second year course, they shall pay the entire amount of Rs. 48,125 by 30th November, 2004. The students who have paid any amount in their second year also, the same shall be adjusted keeping in mind the average fee determined by us by the college authorities. In respect of any difference of amount of fee, which the students are required to pay for the average fee of the academic year 2003-04, the difference of the amount as against the amount paid by them in the said session and the amount determined by us aforesaid shall be paid by them within a reasonable time, say before they undertake the final examination.

This provisional or tentative determination of fee is subject to final determination which may be made by the Committee and would be open to adjustment on either side i. e. in case if the determination by the Committee is less than the fee paid by the students, the respondent institution shall refund the excess amount without any delay, say within maximum period of three weeks from such determination, but in case the fee determined by the Committee is found more than the fee paid by the students, they would make the deficiency good within a maximum period of one month from the date of the said determination. All the appellants and other like students of 2003-04 batch of MBA/mca course shall give an undertaking along with a notarized affidavit of the aforesaid fact within a maximum period of three weeks from today before the Director/principal of the institution, failing which the benefit of this interim arrangement made by the Court would not be available to them and it will be open to the respondent institution to realise the fee as has been determined by them".

2. We now proceed to give our reasons.

3. This special appeal arises out of an order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 14-9-04 by means of which the writ petition filed by the appellants challenging the demand of additional ice for pursuing M. B. A. /m. C. A course in Northern India Engineering College, Faizabad Road, Lucknow has been dismissed.

4. For making the higher education, both technical and non-technical, available to the maximum number of students, who are desirous of pursuing such higher studies, without compromising with the quality of higher education, one of the foremost consideration and essential feature is the determination of fee, i. e. laying down the fee structure for such higher studies.

5. The question has been considered by the Apex Court in various cases and/guidelines and directions have also been issued regarding the manner and the factors, which should be taken into consideration for determining such fee. In T. M. A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka, 2002 (2) LBESR 933 (SC) : (2002) 8 S. C. C. 481, the Supreme Court laid down certain guidelines and issued directions for determination of fee in pursuance of which a GO. dat















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top