SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 1883

K.N.OJHA, R.K.AGRAWAL
Shiv Narain Karmendra Narain – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.UPADHYA, SHAMBHU CHOPRA,

R. K. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) THE Tribunal, Delhi, has referred the following two questions of law under Section 256 (1) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the act), for opinion of this Court :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the trading loss of embezzlement was not allowable during the previous year ending on 31st Dec, 1977, relevant to the asst. yr. 1978-79 ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the. Tribunal was justified in law in upholding the disallowance of Rs. 11,474 under Section 80vv ?"

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows : the present reference relates to the asst. yr. 1978-79. The applicant is a firm deriving income from the running of oil mill, Khandsari business and the running of ice and cold storage plant. It maintains its account on calendar year basis. For its business, it maintains depots at various places including Calcutta, Cuttack and Haldwani. At Haldwani, the depot is utilized both as sales outlet and as purchasing agency. The depot is in the charge of a manager, assistant manager and an accountant. So




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top