SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 1659

R.K.AGRAWAL, K.N.OJHA
Arvind Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Tax Recovery Officer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHARAT JI AGRAWAL, R.P.AGRAWAL, S.P.GUPTA, SHAMBHU CHOPRA,

R. K. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these writ petitions have been filed by the same petitioner challenging the proceedings and the order passed under Section 179 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the Act. While in writ petition No. 1502 of 2002, the petitioner has sought a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the notice dated 26-3-2002 issued by the Tax recovery Officer, Noida, respondent No. 1, filed as Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition in respect of the alleged outstanding income tax dues against M/s. Shashank Polyplast Limited formerly Shashank Polyplast Private Limited, respondent No. 3 and other consequential reliefs, in writ petition No. 911 of 2003 the petitioner seeks a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 29th May, 2003 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, income Tax, Circle Noida, respondent No. 1, filed as Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition and other consequential reliefs.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts giving rise to the present writ petitions are as follows: according to the petitioner, after doing post graduation in Commerce from Gorakhpur university he got a job on 12th February, 197



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top