SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 935

ASHOK BHUSHAN
VIRENDRA KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.P.MISHRA, N.N.Jaiswal,

ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.

Heard Counsel for the the petitioner and learned standing Counsel who appears for Respondent No. 1. List has been revised but no one has appeared for Respondent Nos. 2 to 6.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing of the order dated 8-6-1995 passed by the opposite party No. 3. Counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged between the parties.

3. Petitioners case in the writ petition, is that he was appointed as Assistant Accountant in U. P. Sahkari Gram Vikas Bank Limited. Petitioner, in paragraph 7 of the writ petition, has stated that regulations, namely U. P. Rajya Sahkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Employees Service Rules, 1976 has been framed and the same was approved by the Board on 22-2-1977. Reference has also been made to Regulation 100 of U. P. Co-operative Society Employees Service Regulations, 1975. Petitioner was suspended on 24-2-1979 and a first information report was lodged against the petitioner on which case Crime No. 49/79 under Section 409 of IPC was registered. During pendency of investigation in criminal case, charge-sheet was also issued on 11-3-1980 alleging 8 charges against the petitioner. Petitioner subm


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top