SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 198

G.P.MATHUR
BAGPAT CO OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LTD – Appellant
Versus
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE 1ST CLASS MEERUT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
U.S.Awasthi,

G. P. MATHUR, J.

The Excise Inspec tor (Molasses), Bagpat Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd. , filed a criminal com plaint against M/s. Bagpat Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd. , Bagpat, District Meerut through its Occupier and General Manager and three others for their prosecution under Section 11 of U. P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the adhiniyam) on the ground that the petitioners (accused) had not followed the provisions of Section 5 (a), 5 (b), 5 (c) and 5 (d) of the Adhiniyam. The learned Magistrate took cognizance and sum moned the accused to face trial. In pur7 sunance of the summons issued to the accused petitioners, they appeared before the learned Magistrate and applied for bail which was granted. Subsequently the accused have filed the present petition under Section 482, Cr. PC. for quashing of the complaint and all proceedings in pursuance thereof which are pending in the Court of learned Magistrate.

2. Shri U. S. Awasthi learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the learned Magistrate erred in taking cog nizance of the offence as the complaint had not been filed by a person who was com petent to do so under Section 13 of the Adhiniya




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top