SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 591

VIRENDRA SARAN
MEENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.S.Tomar,

VIRENDRA SARAN, J.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned Government Advocate.

2. Smt. Meena is alleged to bea victim in an offence under Section 363/3661. P. C. registered as Crime No. 35/98 at P. S. Phardhan, Distt. Kheri. The F. I. R. of the case was lodged by Krishna Kumar in which it was mentioned that his daughter had eloped with Randhir.

3. Smt. Meena has filed this applica tion with the allegations that she is major and has entered into marriage with Randhir on 11-2-1998. A medical certifi cate of Chief Medical Officer, I Cheri has been filed as Annexure-2 which shows that according to doctor age of Smt. Meena was about 15years. In Annexure-45mt. Meena has filed two coloured photographs along with Randhir showing some marriage ceremony going on. Smt. Meena and Randhir are present in Court. No doubt photographs are of the persons who are present in Court. From appearence Smt. Meena appears to be major. A copy of the marriage certificate of Arya Samaj Man-dir, Barabanki has also been filed. An-nexure-5 is medical certificate of Dr. Ran-jana Mishra, Obsterician & Gynae cologist which, shows that urine test for pregnancy has been found to be positive. This cert









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top