SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 523

R.K.MAHAJAN
PREM PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hari Om Krishna Srivastava, SATYA PRAKASH,

R. K. MAHAJAN, J.

This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 9- 2-1978, passed by Opposite Party No. 1

(Annexure III) and to issue any other writ, order or direction which this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and cir cumstances of the case.

2. In this petition dispute started from 1963 over a question of grove which is under Bhumidhari of opposite party Nos. 4 and 5 as alleged by them which should not have the matter of consolidation proceed ings started in the village when it was shown to be grove and was included in the chak allotted to the petitioner. The mis take was rectified by Settlement Officer Consolidation vide its order dated 6- 10-1993 (Annexure 4 to the writ petition) but later on opposite party Nos. 4 and 5 found difficulty in getting the order imple mented. The matter went up to the Revenue Board in Second Appeal assail ing the finding of the suit filed by opposite party Nos. 4 and 5, under Section 229-B of the U. P. Zamindari and Land Reforms Act (hereinafter referred to as the U. P. Z. A. & L. R. Act) for declaration of





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top