HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
D.S.Sinha, M.L.Singhal
ASHA TEXTILES PRIVATE LIMITED
Versus
STATE OF U P
Decided On : 03 September 1998
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 29404 of 1991
Collection Charges - U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Rules - The court held that collection charges cannot exceed Rs. 3.75 as per rules 255 and 259 and a previous Division Bench decision. The petition succeeded and the respondents were directed not to insist on payment exceeding Rs. 3.75.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to restrain respondents No. 1 to 4 from insisting on payment of an amount equivalent to 10 per cent of the money sought to be recovered under a specific citation dated 28th August, 1991.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that as per rules 255 and 259 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Rules and a previous Division Bench decision, the recovery charges cannot exceed Rs. 3.75, and the demand of the respondents in excess thereof is untenable. The petition succeeded, and the respondents were directed not to insist on payment exceeding Rs. 3.75.
Issues: The main issue was the insistence of the respondents on payment exceeding the permissible collection charges under the relevant rules.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on rules 255 and 259 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Rules and a previous Division Bench decision to conclude that the recovery charges cannot exceed Rs. 3.75.
Final Decision: The petition succeeded, and the respondents were directed not to insist on payment exceeding Rs. 3.75 in respect of the recovery of the amount under the specific citation dated 28th August, 1991.
Heard Shri Rajesh Kumar Agrawal learned Counsel appear ing for the petitioners, Shri Krishna Murari learned Counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5 and Shri A. K. Shukla learned Standing Counsel representing respondent No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
2. At the outset, Shri Rajesh Kumar Agrawal learned Counsel for the petitioners, states that instant petition be treated to be confined to the prayer No. (iii) only.
3. The prayer of the petitioner is that" the respondents No. 1 to 4 be restrained from insisting payment of an amount equivalent to 10 per cent of the money sought to be recovered under the citation dated 28th August, 1991.
4. The contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that under the relevant rules, namely, 255 and 259 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Rules, 1952, collection charges can be recovered at the rate of Rs. 3. 75 only, and not more than that. In support of his contention the learned
Counsel cites the Division Bench decision of this Court, dated 20th January, 1992, rendered in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No 4307 of 1981, M/s. Chemopulp Tissues Limited v. State of U. P. and others.
5. Neither Shri A. K. Shukla learned Standing Counsel nor Sbri Krishna Murari learned Counsel for the respon dent No. 5, disputes this position that in view of rules 255 and 259 of the Rules and the decision of this Court in the case of Mis. Chemopulp Tissues Limited (supra) recovery charges cannot exceed more than Rs. 3. 75 and the demand of the respondent in excess thereof is wholly untenable.
6. In the result, the petition succeeds and is allowed. The respondents are directed not to insist payment of collection charges more than Rs. 3. 75 in respect of the recovery of the amount under the cita tion dated 28th August, 1991, a photo copy whereof is, Annexure 10) to the petition.
Petition allowed.
.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.