SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 971

RAVI S.DHAVAN, V.P.GOEL
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


RAVI S. DHAVAN, J.

These large number of the writ petitions raise issues in public law. The issue has been precipitated by the State of U. P. in taxing the Union of India and, thus, giving rise to the main question whether the property of Union of India is exempt from State taxation ? The State of U. P. does not accept the proposition in the affirmative. In fact, it has taken a stand that it can tax the Union of India. In the circumstances, when the case began a preliminary issue was raised that this Court cannot adjudicate upon the matter and that the Union of India should be relegated to the alternative remedies under the State enactment. The State enactment is the U. P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 before amendments in 1994, it was known as the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948. The reference hereinafter to this enactment will be as "the Act".

2. The facts are simple. The Government of India, its Department of Telecommunication, has been assumed to be in trade and business by the Trade Tax Department, and the gross revenues of the Telecommunication Department collected from subscribers, using the telephone facility, have been subjected to trade tax by the State of U. P. Prior to the Constitution



























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top