SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 1789

MARKANDEY KATJU, R.S.TRIPATHI
RANJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
VICE-CHAIRMAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.MISHRA, A.P.Sahi, G.K.Singh, S.N.Singh, V.K.SINGH, Vimlesh Srivastava,

M. KATJU, J.

By means of this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to implement the order dated 8-1-2002 Annexure 4 to the writ petition passed by the respondent No. 2 and to get the unauthorized construction made by the respondent No. 3 Baijnath Maurya demolished. It has been mentioned that the respondent No. 3 has sold the disputed property to respondent No. 4. Sri A. K. Misra has appeared for the respondents 1 and 2 and has filed a counter- affidavit. The respondents No. 3 and 4 both have been served with notice of this petition and the respondent No. 4 has appeared through his Counsel Sri Vimlesh Srivastava and has filed counter- affidavit.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

3. The petitioner claims to be the owner of the house in Nazul Plot No. 7, Civil Station, Allahabad. The residential house of the petitioner is numbered as 7/2, Civil Station, Allahabad. The petitioner purchased free hold right in the said plot from the State Government through the District Magistrate, Allahabad vide registered deed dated 15-10-2000.

4. It is alleged in paragraph 5 of the writ petition that the petitioners building was construct

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top