SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 254

R.B.MISRA
SUDHA CHATURVEDI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.RAI, A.P.Sahi, Enakshi Sharma, G.K.Singh, M.C.Chaturvedi, R.N.Singh, S.S.SHARMA, V.K.SINGH,

R. B. MISRA, J.

Heard Sri V. K. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri M. C. Chaturvedi, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel along with Sri S. S. Sharma and Enakshi Sharma learned Standing Counsel.

2. In this writ petition prayer has been made to quash the order dated 32-4-1997 (Annexure-14 to the writ petition) passed by the Deputy Director of Education (Madhyamik), V Region, Varanasi and further prayer has been made for commanding the respondents to make payment of salary to the petitioner regularly along with arrears. The case was heard by this Court several times and on 19-10-2001 this Court has passed order which reads as below:

"smt. Sudha Chaturvedi has appeared in person. Sri Rajni Kant Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel, is also present for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. No one has appeared for Committee of Management.

This Court had granted time to learned Standing Counsel to file a counter affidavit vide its order dated 8th May, 1997 but no counter affidavit has been filed so far. The Management has filed a counter affidavit which supports the claim of the petitioner. This Court has also passed an order on 6-12-1999 directing the District Inspector of Schools to recons
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top