SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 226

T.GEORGE JOSEPH
MEJU RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


T. GEORGE JOSEPH, J.

This is a revision against the order of Collector Stamp/additional Collector (F & R) Mirzapur dated 28-1- 2003.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the revisionist on the issue of admissiblity and gone through the order of the Collector carefully.

3. The learned Counsel for the revisionsit argued that the land in question was agricultural in nature at the time of the execution of the sale-deed and he has produced the copies of the Khasra and Khatauni and has pointed out that the seller had sought permission from the Collector under Section 157 of the U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act which was required the land was un-questionably agricultural in nature.

4. The departmental Representative pointed out that the said document itself was accompanied by map which shows residential land all around the plot in question. Therefore it was proper to treat the sold plot in the residential category and the market value was calculated on that basis.

5. After going through the order, I find that it is very sketchy in nature. The order does not speak about the objections raised by the revisionst and how the Collector has considered those objections and how he has arrived at the conclusio












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top