T.GEORGE JOSEPH
MEJU RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
This is a revision against the order of Collector Stamp/additional Collector (F & R) Mirzapur dated 28-1- 2003.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the revisionist on the issue of admissiblity and gone through the order of the Collector carefully.
3. The learned Counsel for the revisionsit argued that the land in question was agricultural in nature at the time of the execution of the sale-deed and he has produced the copies of the Khasra and Khatauni and has pointed out that the seller had sought permission from the Collector under Section 157 of the U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act which was required the land was un-questionably agricultural in nature.
4. The departmental Representative pointed out that the said document itself was accompanied by map which shows residential land all around the plot in question. Therefore it was proper to treat the sold plot in the residential category and the market value was calculated on that basis.
5. After going through the order, I find that it is very sketchy in nature. The order does not speak about the objections raised by the revisionst and how the Collector has considered those objections and how he has arrived at the conclusio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.