SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 1424

U.S.TRIPATHI, D.P.GUPTA
RAM BHAROSEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.B.L.Gaur, R.P.SINGH, RAVINDRA SINGH,

U. S. TRIPATHI, J.

This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 28-7-1981 passed by the then VIIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Etah in Sessions Trial No. 165 of 1981 convicting appellant Ram Bharosey under Section 302 IPC and 201 IPC and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life under Section 302 and RI for a period of one year under Section 201 IPC. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution story, briefly stated, was that the appellant Ram Bharosey, Umesh Chandra (PW 1) and his younger brother Dinesh (9) deceased, were residents of village Kamalpur Mai, P. S. Sakeet, District Etah. Father of Umesh Chandra (PW 1) had died some 8 years ago leaving behind his 5 sons. Dinesh (9) deceased was youngest amongst his brothers. His three elder brothers Mahesh Chandra, Suresh Chandra and Girish Chandra were living at Firozabad. Dinesh deceased alongwith his brother Umesh Chandra (PW 1) and mother was residing at village Kamalpur Mai.

3. During consolidation operation, a well of Umesh Chandra (PW 1) had gone into chak of Ram Bharosey appellant and the appellant Ram Bharosey had to pay its compensation to Umesh Chandra (PW 1) and his bro



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top