HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
M. Katju and Prakash Krishna, JJ.
Om Prakash Srivastava
Versus
State of U.P.
Civil Misc. Writ Petition 64 of 2003
Decided On : 05 March 2003
Civil Misc. Writ Petition 64 Of 2003
Regularisation - U.P. Agriculture Service - Regularisation of petitioner justified
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was appointed on ad-hoc basis in the U.P Agriculture Service. An adverse entry against him for the year 1974-75 prevented his regularisation until it was expunged in 1984. The petitioner sought regularisation from an earlier date when his juniors were regularised.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the petitioner's prayer for regularisation justified, stating that but for the adverse entry, the petitioner would have been regularised at the same time as his juniors.
Issues: Regularisation of petitioner in U.P. Agriculture Service
Ratio Decidendi: The court allowed the writ petition and directed the petitioner to be regularised from the date when his juniors were regularised, considering the adverse entry had been expunged.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and directed the petitioner to be regularised from 3. 7. 1981 and granted all consequential benefits within two months.
( 1 ) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. In this case on 6. 1. 2003 learned Standing Counsel as granted time to file counter-affidavit and thereafter on 11. 2. 2003 time was again granted for that purpose but no counter-affidavit has been filed till today. We are not inclined to grant any further time and are disposing of this writ petition.
( 2 ) THE petitioner was appointed on 22. 12. 1972 on ad-hoc basis in the U. P Agriculture Service. On 3rd July, 1981 an order of regularisation was passed with regard to 14 persons including some persons junior to the petitioner but not for the petitioner. The reason why the regularisation order was not passed in favour of the petitioner was that there was an adverse entry against him for the year 1974-75. This adverse entry was subsequently expunged on 30. 6. 1984, wide annexure-5 to the writ petition. The petitioner was regularised with effect from 15. 12. 1993 but his prayer is that he should be regularised from 3. 1. 1981 when his juniors were regualarised.
( 3 ) IN our opinion the prayer of the petitioner is justified. But for the adverse entry for the year 1974-75 the petitioner would have been regularised with effect from 3. 7. 1981 when his juniors were regularised.
( 4 ) WE, therefore, allow this writ petition and direct that the petitioner should be regularised from 3. 7. 1981 and be granted all consequential benefits within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before the authority concerned.
. .
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.