SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 1017

G.K.GUPTA, JAGDISH BHALLA
Prakash Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Kumar Dixit – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.P.MISHRA, S.K.Kalia,

JAGDISH BHALLA, J.

( 1 ) AGGRIEVED by the order dated 7. 3. 2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 3111[ss] of 1991, the appellant has filed this Special Appeal. The order dated 7. 3. 2003 passed in the aforesaid writ petition by the learned Single judge reads as under:-

"heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri K. M. N. Chak appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 4 and the learned standing Counsel the petitioner has alleged in the petition that due to his illness and thereafter due to the death of his father, he could not attend the School. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the termination order dated 19. 7. 1984 passed by the opposite parties 2 and 3 was not approved by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari by the order dated 23. 8. 1984. He further submits that the resignation letter dated 11. 10. 1984 was also withdrawn by the petitioner on 12. 10. 1984 and till date the resignation has also not been accepted by the opposite parties. In view of the aforesaid facts, the opposite parties are directed to allow the petitioner to work from 11. 3. 2003. The Basic shiksha Adhikari shall ensure the compliance of the order. "

( 2 ) THE aforesaid order has been challenged by th




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top