SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 1066

RATANAKAR DASH
SAKUNTALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kameshwar Singh, P.R.MAURYA, Prabhakar Pandey, Sudhakar Pandey,

R. K. DASH, J.

Kripa Shankar Shukla (hereinafter referred to as the deceased), husband of the petitioner was done to death on 26-10-1995 night. It is alleged that there was bad blood between the deceased and Swami Nath Yadav and others. On the date of incident Swami Nath Yadav and others committed murder of the deceased and threw his dead body inside a well in order to screen the offence. The case of the petitioner is that at the relevant time respondent No. 2 was the Sub-Inspector of Police of Bansdeeh P. S. He alongwith respondent No. 3, the autopsy doctor connived with each other in order to screen the offenders created documents to show that the death of the deceased was accidental. Complaining against both police officer and the doctor, petitioner made a representation to the President of India as well as the State Government to get the matter investigated by CBCID. Thereupon considering his prayer the State Government entrusted the case for investigation to CBCID. Pursuant thereto, the case was investigated and on completion thereof, charge-sheet was laid against five persons. The investigating officer also found prima facie case against respondent Nos. 2 and 3 that they misu









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top