SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 2548

K.N.OJHA
AMAR PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anees Ahmad, N.K.DWIVEDI, SHEKHAR YADAV,

K. N. OJHA, J.

Instant revision has been preferred against the order dated 23-11-2002 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, in Case No. 396/11 of 2001 (State v. Nathoo Lal) by which non-bailable warrant has been issued against the revisionists Amar Pal and Pappu, sons of Shyam Lal, Maya Devi widow of Shyam Lal, Kamla Devi wife of Veer Pal, Sobaran son of Rewati, Sukhpal Singh son of Sobran Singh, Munni Devi wife of Sukhpal Singh, and Satendra Singh son of Sobran Singh for being arrested and produced before the Court so that they may face trial in a case under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 201 and 120-B I. P. C.

2. Heard Sri Anees Ahmad, learned Counsel for the revisionist and Sri Shekhar Yadav and Sri N. K. Dwivedi, learned AGA and have gone through the impugned order and the papers filed alongwith the revision.

3. The complainant Natthu Lal moved an application under Section 156 (3) Cr. P. C. against the revisionists. The Chief Judicial Magistrate has directed for investigation in the case. Investigation was done and final report was submitted, on which notice was issued to the complainant. After hearing the learned Counsel for the complainant the learned Chief Jud















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top