SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 2315

V.K.CHATURVEDI
ROSHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DAYA SHANKER MISHRA, WAJID ALI,

V. K. CHATURVEDI, J.

Roshan and Hakeem Ullah have filed this appeal against the judgment and order dated 23-9-1999 passed by Special Judge, E. C. Act, Basti in special case No. 27 of 1995 convicting the appellant Roshan under Section 23 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, hereinafter referred to as "the Act" and sentencing him 15 years R. I. and fine of Rs. one lac. The appellant Hakeem Ullah was convicted under Section 20 (b) (2) of the Act and sentenced to five years R. I. and fine of Rs. 20,000.

2. Heard Sri D. S. Misra and Syed Wajid Ali, learned counsel for the appellants and learned A. G. A. Perused the lower Court record.

3. Both the appeals are connected. They are related to the same time and arrest of the appellants. Same question of law and evidence involved and they are being disposed of by a common judgment.

4. Appellants Roshan and Hakeem Ullah were arrested by S. O. V. P. Shukla on 29-9-1987 and from possession of the appellant Roshan about 4 Kg. Charas and from the possession of Hakeem Ullah about 10 Kg. Ganja were said to have been recovered at about 7. 30 p. m. for which a First Information Report was lodged against appellant Roshan in crim





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top