SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 1816

VINEET SARAN
TAHSILDAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.Mishra,

VINEET SARAN, J.

Triveni Singh, father of petitioner No. 1 was recruited as Constable in the year 1947. While he was in service in the year 1960, he was reported missing and since then he has not been traced out. When after the due date of his superannuation, no pensionary benefits and other funds of Triveni Singh had been paid to the petitioners, in the year 1994 an application was filed by the petitioners for payment of funds and pensionary benefits as well as for appointment of the petitioner No. 1 on compassionate ground under the Dying in Harness Rules, 1974. The said application for the appointment on compassionate ground has been rejected by order dated 14-2-1995. The petitioner has thus filed this writ petition with prayer to quash the order dated 14-2-1995 and provide employment to the petitioner No. 1 under the Dying in Harness Rules and also for a direction to the respondents to grant pension and pay other admissible funds to the petitioners. During the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner No. 2, Smt. Chhabba Devi wife of missing constable Triveni Singh has died.

2. With regard to claim of the petitioner No. 1 to provide him appointment on compassionate ground








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top