SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 1984

K.N.SINHA
MOHD ZIRGHAM ANSARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandrakesh Mishra, DAYA SHANKER MISHRA, MOHD.FARUQ, Mohd.Nausad Siddiqui, S.M.A.Kazmi,

K. N. SINHA, J.

The present application under Section 482 Cr. P. C. has been filed for quashing of the charge-sheet No. 129 of 2002 (Case Crime No. 127 of 2002) under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act of Police Station Alinagar, District Chandauli.

2. The brief facts, giving rise to this application, are that applicant Mohd. Zirgham Ansari was married with Smt. Shamima Begum the sister of Riaz Ahmad, Respondent No. 3. At the time of marriage, age of Smt. Shamima Begum was quoted ten years less than she actually then was. Her date of birth in the High School Certificate was shown to be 5th of July, 1968 but in the affidavit, it was shown to be 5th of October, 1978. When the applicant and his family sent a legal notice for the same and sent the amount of Mehar, through money order, the Respondent No. 3 lodged a FIR on 12-8-2002 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act against the applicant and his family members. However by Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 5059 of 2002, arrest of the petitioner was stayed and later on the charge sheet (Annexure-5) was filed in the Court. It was fur










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top