SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 2034

M.C.JAIN, ONKARESHWAR BHATT
STATE OF U P – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.S.Maurya, Vinay Saran,

M. C. JAIN, J.

The State has come up in the appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 1-9-1981 recorded by Sri Ikramul Bari, the then IV Addl. Sessions Judge, Bijnor in Sessions Trial No. 412 of 1980. The two respondents, namely, Surender Singh and Smt. Sanyogita were tried before the Court below. The charges against Surender Singh were under Sections 302 and 392 IPC whereas Smt. Sanyogita faced trial under Section 302 IPC read with Section 120-B IPC.

2. The deceased was Devi Singh alias Bhullan Singh. He used to reside in village Shahpur Sukha, P. S. Kiratpur, District Shahjahanpur and was aged about 35 years. Sanyogita accused lived nearby. In between the house of deceased and that of Sanyogita, a ruined Ghair existed. Devi Singh deceased had developed illicit relation with Sanyogita and used to spend a lot of money on her Smt. Vidyawati PW 1 (wife of Devi Singh deceased) became aware of it and after great pursuation succeeded in stopping the visits of Devi Singh to Smt. Sanyogita. Sanyogita resented it she was deprived of the financial benefit. The incident took place in between the night of 4/5. 6 1980 at the house of deceased Devi Singh. Since about a month before the inc


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top