SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 2077

K.N.SINHA
Krishna Kumar Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DILIP KUMAR, RAJIV GUPTA, SUNIL KUMAR,

K. N. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THE above revision petitions have been filed against the judgment and order dated 2/11/2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. VIII. Bulandshahr in Criminal Revision Nos. 190/2002, 201/2002,209/2002, 215/2002, 216/2002, 217/2002 and 255/2002, arising out of Complaint Case Nos. 55/2001, 54/2001, 56/2001,57/2001,58/2001, 53/2001 and 59/200 1, respectively filed by respondent No. 2 against the present revisionists.

( 2 ) THE brief facts, giving rise to the present revisions, is that respondent No. 2 filed a complaint against the revisionists under section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as Act) before the A. C. J. M. Court No. 3. Bulandshahr. The Magistrate, after recording the statement of complainant and the witnesses, passed order summoning the accused. The accused-revisionists appeared before the Magistrate and filed objection against the summoning order dated 14/5/2001. The Magistrate allowed the said objection and set aside the summoning order vide his order dated 30/4/2002. The respondent No. 2, complainant, filed the above revisions before the Sessions Court. Bulandshahr and all the revisions were allowed, set























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top