SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 2132

RAKESH TIWARI
Modh. Umar – Appellant
Versus
Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Madhur Prakash, O.P.SINGH,

RAKESH TIWARI, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

( 2 ) BY means of this writ petition the petitioner is challenging the validity and correctness of the impugned notice dated 1. 12. 2000 passed by the Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Suar, district Rampur by which the services of the petitioner have been dispensed with as no longer required.

( 3 ) IT is alleged that the name of the petitioner was registered in the Employment Exchange of rampur. His date of birth according to the certificate issued by the Principal, Government Inter college, Rampur is 2. 3. 1964 and he belongs to backward class. It is further alleged that he had appeared in High School Examination but failed.

( 4 ) IT is submitted that on account of retirement of some regular employee a post of peon fell vacant in the office of the respondent No. 2. And the petitioner requested to respondent No. 2 that he may be permitted to work on the post of Peon in his office vide letter dated 21. 1. 2000. It appears that respondent No. 2 issued a forwarding note for placing the same before the appointing committee recommending petitioner for appointment. The matter was placed before the appoi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top