SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 2164

RAKESH TIWARI
RAJESHWAR PRASAD SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION ALIASSECONDARYALIAS U P SHIKSHA SAMNYA ANUBHAG- ALLAHABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.Tripathi,

RAKESH TIWARI, J.

Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

2. The petitioners have filed this petition challenging notice dated 9-11-2001 issued by the Director of Education (Madhyamik), Faizabad directing them to show cause as to why action be not taken to cancel their irregular promotion.

3. It appears that petitioners were appointed as ad hoc L. T. Grade teachers and approval to their appointments was granted on 11-3-83 by the D. I. O. S. Their services were regularized on 8-2-96 but were not paid salary, hence they filed writ petition in this Court in which this Court directed for payment of their salary. It is admitted by the respondents that Regional Deputy Director of Education, Faizabad by his letter dated 11-3-1981 sanctioned three posts of Lecturers in Hindi, Sanskrit and Economics with the condition that on promotion to these posts, the resulting vacancies in C. T. grade will be abolished and no appointment shall be made on them. It is stated in the counter-affidavit that concealing these facts, the Management appointed three teachers of C. T. grade in 1996 namely, Rajeshwar Prasad Singh, Shatrudaman Singh and Ram Kewal Gaur illegally, which had been abolish









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top