SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1436

K.D.SHAHI
SUKHBIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


K. D. SHAHI, J.

The present appeal has been preferred by appellants, namely, Sukhbir, Jagdish, Shri Pal and Virendra against the judgment and order dated 9-12-1980 passed by Sri K. K. Birla, the then 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarnagar in Sessions Trial No. 16 of 1979 (State v. Sukhbir and others), whereby ap pellants Sukhbir and Jagdish have been convicted and sentenced to undergo one year R. I. and six months R. I. under Sec tion 332, read with Section 34, I. P. C. and auction 225, I. P. C. respectively. Further appellants Shri Pal and Virendra have been convicted under Section 224, I. P. C. and sentenced each or them to imprison ment till the rising of the Court.

2. In brief the case of the prosecution is that on 11-2-1980 one Jagannath Prasad lodged a report at police station Khandala, district Muzaffarnagar against accused Shri Pal and Virendra under Sections 452. 323 and 426, I. P. C. . The investigation of the case was entrusted to Sri Ved Pal Singh, S. I. (P. W. 1 ). On 12-2-1978 as well at about 1. 00p. m. S. I. Ved Pal Singh along with two other constables went to the house of ac cused Shri Pal and Virendra and arrested the accused persons. While he was taking bo






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top