B.S.VERMA
DHIRENDRA SINGH RAWAT – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UDHAM SINGH NAGAR – Respondent
2. The impugned order has been as sailed mainly on the ground that the no tice for no confidence motion was pre sented before the District Magistrate, i. e. respondent no. 1, on 12-4-2007 and the meeting of no confidence motion was held on 12-5-2007 after expiry of period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the notice and thus, the meeting is null and void.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the mandatory pro vision of Rule 481 (1) of the Uttaranchal Cooperative Society Rules, 2004 (for short the Rules) has been violated.
4. In para no. 13 of the writ peti tion is has been contended that on 29-3-2007 the District Assistant Registrar Cooperative Society Uttarakhand passed an order by which the name of the nominated members have been with drawn and on 6-3-2007 a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.