SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2132

TARUN AGARWALA
U P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
RAMJI NAIK – Respondent


Advocates:
Ajit Kumar, R.A.Gaur, RAJIV SHARMA,

TARUN AGARWALA, J.

( 1 ) BY means of this petition, the petitioners have challenged the validity and legality of the award passed by the Labour court under section 6f of the U. P. Industrial disputes Act. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition is, that the workman was working as a conductor and was suspended on the basis of an inspection being made, wherein 14 passengers were found to be travelling on a bus without a ticket. The workman was charge-sheeted. An enquiry officer was appointed to conduct the domestic enquiry. The enquiry officer submitted a report holding that the charges against the workmen stood proved. The management issued a show cause notice to show cause why the services of the workman should not be terminated. Subsequently, the management by an order dated 28-11-1992 terminated the services of the workman.

( 2 ) THE workman, being aggrieved by the action of the management, filed an application under section 6f of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act before the labour Court alleging violation of the provision of section 6e (2) (b) of U. P. Industrial Disputes Act. The workman contended that adjudication case No. 181 of 1992, with regard to his entitleme












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top