KRISHNA MURARI, J.

Heard Sri Vijai Kumar Ojha, learned Counsel for the petitioner.

2. Facts giving rise to dispute are as under :

3. In the basic year Avadhu, Parasuram, Panchu sons of Vindeshwari and Kalpa widow of Vindeshwari were recorded as bhumidhar. After death of Kalpa, an objection was filed by Panchu, Parasuram and Avadhu claiming partition of the land in dispute. Another objection was filed by contesting respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and one Ram Bhajan claiming rights on the basis of adverse possession over the land in dispute. Consolidation Officer consolidated both the objection and vide order dated 28-11-1990 allowed the objection filed by respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and Ram Bhajan and directed their names to be recorded over the land in dispute. The order was challenged in appeal. Vide order dated 28-12-2001 Settlement Officer Consolidation allowed the appeal and set aside the order of the Consolidation Officer dated 28- 11-1990 and maintained the entry of name of Panchu Parasuram and Avadhu over the land in dispute. Appellate order was challenged by respondent Nos. 6 and 7 as well as Ram Bhajan by filing a revision. During the pendency of the revision, Ram Bhajan died issueless

Click Here to Read the rest of this document