SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2162

S.S.KULSHRESTHA
SANJAY AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
GANGA PRASAD AGRAWAL – Respondent


Advocates:
G.P.Agarwal, PRAMOD JAIN,

S. S. KULSHRESTHA, J.

This revision under section 25 of Small Causes Courts Act was brought by the applicant/defendant against the order dated 23. 11. 2005 passed by the learned Judge Small Causes Court/additional District Judge, Allahabad whereby striking off the defence under Order XV, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) on the Application 25-C moved in that behalf by the landlord/opposite parties. It is said that the Trial Court has erect while construing the first date of hearing and finding the deposits to be not in accordance with law. For the purpose of Order XV, Rule 5 of the Code the date of hearing would be the date when the Court applied its mind to determine the points of controversy and not date fixed for filing of written statement. The Trial Court has fixed 12. 1. 2006 for final hearing on the points in issue and so that would be deemed to be the first date of hearing. Finding to the contrary recorded by the Trial Court holding 3. 1. 2005 to be the first date of hearing when the written statement was filed as patently illegal and against the well settled principle of law. It has also been contended that the deposit under sectio








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top