SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2328

R.K.RASTOGI
PARMINDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.RAI, A.K.SINGH, Avtar Singh, D.K.Singh, GURBAKSH SINGH, P.C.SRIVASTAVA,

R. K. RASTOGI, J.

In this application under Section 482, Cr. P. C. to quash the further proceedings of Crl. Case No. 1434 of 2004 under Section 467, 468, 471 and 420, I. P. C. , State v. Parminder Kaur, pending in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampur, an application was moved on 1-9-2007 by Smt. Parminder Kaur for listing of the above case, in which a prayer was also made that at the time of grant of bail in the above case the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2, Rampur vide order dated 24-12-2003 had imposed condition upon her that she will give an undertaking that she would not go outside India during pendency of the criminal case against her and that she would deposit her passport within a period of seven days. It was stated in the application that her husband living in America is ill and so she has to go to America to look-after her ailing husband. It has also been suited that she is green card holder of America and this card is to be renewed by 15-9-2007. Therefore, she prayed that passport should be given to her and she should be permitted to leave the country for a period of three months.

2. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant, learned A. G. A


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top