SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2497

PRAKASH KRISHNA
Ramzan – Appellant
Versus
Gafooran – Respondent


Advocates:
J.N.AGARWAL, KRISHNA SWAROOP, Ramji Saxena, YOGESH AGARWAL,

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiffs appeal and it arises out of a partition suit No. 32 of 1976 filed by the present appellants claiming 2/ 3rd share in the three houses detailed in schedules A, B, and C of the plaint. The suit having been decreed with respect to the property detailed in schedules B and C and dismissed with respect to the property described in schedule A, the plaintiffs have come up in the present appeal. The defendants have not filed any appeal and, therefore, the dispute is confined to the property described in schedule A which is a house with open piece of land and a latrine.

( 2 ) THE suit was instituted on the pleas that one Khaira was a common ancestor of the plaintiffs and defendants No. 1, 8 and 9. After his death, the property was inherited by his widow Smt. Guriha. On the death of Smt. Guriha, the property was inherited by her two daughters and one son, namely, mst. Tazia Alias Zainab and Mst. Nuria and son Hussain. All these persons came in joint possession of the property left by Smt. Gurhia. Smt. Gurhia, according to the plaintiffs, had three houses described in schedules A, B, and C of the plaint. After the death of Husain (son), his widow Gafooran defendant N







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top