PRAKASH KRISHNA
Ramzan – Appellant
Versus
Gafooran – Respondent
( 2 ) THE suit was instituted on the pleas that one Khaira was a common ancestor of the plaintiffs and defendants No. 1, 8 and 9. After his death, the property was inherited by his widow Smt. Guriha. On the death of Smt. Guriha, the property was inherited by her two daughters and one son, namely, mst. Tazia Alias Zainab and Mst. Nuria and son Hussain. All these persons came in joint possession of the property left by Smt. Gurhia. Smt. Gurhia, according to the plaintiffs, had three houses described in schedules A, B, and C of the plaint. After the death of Husain (son), his widow Gafooran defendant N
Mohd. Zainulabudeen v. Sayed Ahmed Mohideen and others
M. Arthur Paul Ratna Raju and others v. Gudese Garaline Augusta Bhushanabai
Thakur Kishan Singh (dead) v. Arvind Kumar
P. T. Munichikkanna Reddy and others v. Revamma and others
Saroop Singh v. Banto and others
See S. M.Karim v. Bibi Sakinal
Annasaheb Bapusaheb Patil v. Balwant
Meethiyan Sidhiqu v. Muhammed Kunju Pareeth Katty and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.