SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2813

PRADEEP KANT, RAJIV SHARMA
KARAN KUMAR YADAV – Appellant
Versus
U P STATE PUBLIC SERVICES TRIBUNAL AND – Respondent


Advocates:
AKHILESH KALRA, Arshad Rizvi, SHYAM MOHAN,

PRADEEP KANT AND RAJIV SHARMA, JJ.

This petition challenges the order passed by the State Public Services Tribunal, dated 6th August, 2007 by means of which the claim petition preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed as barred by limitation. Leaving chequered history of the case it would be relevant to mention that the petitioner had applied for being appointed as Manager-cum-Clerk/vyasthapak in pursuance of the advertisement published in the year 1984. The petitioner in his application has mentioned that he had appeared in the examination of Diploma in Tourism and Hotel Management of which result has not been declared but at the same time he has also mentioned that he has passed the examination.

2. The petitioner who, was earlier working as daily wage employee, was issued appointment order on 1. 1. 1985 and was also sent for training. Since the petitioner was not possessed with Diploma in Tourism and Hotel Management from any recognized institution, as per the terms of the advertisement, he was given an opportunity to produce the same. Though the petitioner in his joining letter dated 1. 1. 1995 has mentioned about the annexing of Diploma Certificate but later on in response




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top