ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
P.C.Verma
KHURANA BROTHERS AND ETC ETC
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL
Decided On : 27 December 2007
R. P. No. 2345, 2344, 2346 and 2343 of 2004
Stamp Duty - Dispute over payment of stamp duty on the instrument of sale of resin by auction - Stamp Act
Fact of the Case:
The dispute relates to the payment of stamp duty on the instrument of sale of resin by auction. The court reviewed the judgment of the Allahabad High Court and examined the document in question to determine if it is a conveyance or simply an instrument of agreement of sale.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the document in question is not a conveyance on sale as the property in goods did not pass on the bidder and the sale was taking place on future dates and of different quantities. Therefore, the court held that the petitioners are not liable to pay the stamp duty.
Issues: The main issue was whether the document in question constituted a conveyance on sale and whether the petitioners were liable to pay the stamp duty.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the definition of 'conveyance' and 'instrument' under Section 2 of the Stamp Act and the interpretation of an agreement to sell versus a sale as established in the case of The Instalment Supply Ltd. v. S. T. O., Ahmedabad & Ors. The court concluded that the document did not constitute a conveyance on sale.
Final Decision: All the review petitions were allowed, and the court held that the petitioners are not liable to pay the stamp duty.
Since all these review petitions are based on common grounds involving similar set of facts and question of law and have been filed seeking review of common judgment dated 13th April, 2004 passed by this Court in aforementioned writ petitions, hence these are being decided by one and common judgment.
2. The dispute relates to payment of stamp duty on the instrument of sale of resin by auc tion. Earlier this Court, following the judg ment of Allahabad High Court M/s. Bhatt In dustries, Damodhara, District Almora & Ors. v. The Divisional Forest Officer, Almora & Ors. , had dismissed these writ petitions vide order dated 13. 4. 2004 by holding that the pe titioners were liable to pay the stamp duty. Now, these review petitions have been filed citing one and common ground that the Divi sion Bench of the Allahabad High Court in the aforesaid judgment did not examine the document in question as to whether it is a con veyance or simply an instrument of agreement of sale.
3. On a careful perusal of the judgment of the Allahabad High Court (supra), we find that the submission of the learned Counsel for the review petitioners/petitioners is correct for the reason that in the said judgment document in question has not been examined. Therefore, we may proceed to examine this question.
4. Form of contract of crude resin is repro duced as under:
"value of the deed: 3,94,400/ -.
This indenture made this 24 day of the March 2001 between the Governor of the Uttaranchal (hereinafter called seller of the one part and M/s. Khurana Brothers, Rishsikesh (hereinafter called the buyer which expression includes its executors, administrators, successors and assigns) of the other part witnessed as follows:
1. The seller in consideration of payment to be made by the buyer as hereinafter pro vided at the rate of Rs. 1972/- per quintal cal culated at per quintal named without con tainer) and in addition the buyer shall have to pay sale tax on the total sale value of the resin 79% or the rate applicable at the time of sale subject to the following lines and conditions.
(A) Approximately 1160 tines 200 Quin tals of crude resin (net weight) will be delivered at resin depot Sultan Nagari. The quantity may increase or decrease by 10% & the buyer will have to accept the quantity made available by the seller.
2. The weight of resin will be the same as has been recorded in the books of the seller. The seller reserves the right to reject the claim of the purchaser for weighment at the time of taking delivery.
(B) The resin sold will remain at purchasers risk from date of acceptance of his bid and the seller will not be responsible for any loss and damage which may occur thereto from any cause whatsoever.
(C) All the resin sold will have to be re moved by the purchaser within 60 days of the date of approval of the sale. It will be removed in not more than 60 installments as follows.
1. Within Days of approval of Sale.
2. Within Days of approval of Sale.
3. Within Days of approval of Sale.
4. Within Days of approval of Sale.
The purchaser can remove resin only with the written permission of the Divisional For est Officer, Nainital, Forest Division, Nainital and on payment in advance of the full cost and sale tax of resin.
The seller does not take any responsibility for the quality of resin contained in the tins and will not give any resin in exchange.
3. The amount of sale price of the lot cal culated on the basis of per quintal bid at the time of auction shall he payable by the buyer irrespective of the fact whether he lifts the material or not.
4. Any resin or tin left within the depot after the last date of lifting shall vest in the Govt. and shall be confiscated and refund in lieu of such resin or tins shall be due to the buyer.
5. No crude resin will be exported by the buyer from the resin depot specified in clause I except by such routes and via such chaukies as may be decided upon and recorded in writ ten by the Forest Officer. The resin tins m
REFERRED TO : Instalment Supply Ltd. v. S.T.O., Ahmedabad and Ors.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.